How Science Reporters Choose Their Sources

Shutterstock: http://ow.ly/MToJK

Shutterstock: http://ow.ly/MToJK

Earlier this month I was honored to take part in an exciting event at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C. The 2-day “Does the Public Trust Science?” event was a deep exploration of the elements that boost and/or diminish trust in science. The following is a recap of a revealing media panel discussion, which I considered a highlight of the event.

https://storify.com/kirkenglehardt/how-science-reporters-choose-their-sources

Additional Information:

3 thoughts on “How Science Reporters Choose Their Sources

  1. Thanks – some valid and useful points. . Would have loved to have read a post without all the tweets plonked in there – don’t think they are particularly useful and they make it hard to read. Maybe one or two particularly insightful or witty ones could work.

    Like

    • Thank you Jackie. I think the benefit of using Storify to share a story is the inclusion of many different points of view. I know it’s not the easiest tool to navigate, and the conversation can sometimes be difficult to follow, but I do think it serves a purpose. I am planning to write a post about the panel I participated in. It will have excerpts from my notes, and will also include the Storify tweet stream for those who want to hear from more than just me. I very much appreciate your comment, thank you!

      Like

  2. Pingback: This Week’s Good Reads: Lost Museums, Warm-Blooded Fish, and Bamboo Math | The UnderStory

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s